A friend sent this to me last week after reading my post about my Lenten failures. Please pay particular attention to the bolded portion:
Hey, Matthew
Thanks for posting about not meeting your goals for Lent. It was encouraging to me because I, too, failed in meeting my goals. They were:
* No Internet
* No snacks in between meals
* No Coke
* Not missing my Bible readings
* Read through The Apostolic FathersI did well with the Coke and with the Fathers. I did well with the snacks until the last week. I lost it with the Internet around week 2. There were gaps in my Bible reading.
Yet, Lent was good for me. It was “successful” even if I was not. It caused me to ask some questions about myself: Why did I start snacking when I was so close to the goal? Why do I make it so easy to miss my regular Bible times? Why am I so addicted to Google? The answers reveal sordid things about myself, of course. I started snacking because I don’t finish well. I miss days with the Bible because I don’t value it as highly as I should. I’m browser dependent because I avoid silence and quiet time by myself (a bunch of issues there!). I’m a failure for sure - and that’s what Lent taught me this year. It prepared me for Holy Week and Easter. Come Good Friday I was eager to hear again that the Father had sent a Saviour for failures such as myself.
I’ll do it again next year [DV] and hope to do better. But if I don’t that’s OK. Jesus came for failures!
Blessings,
Puddleglum
What is the gospel if it isn’t that Christ came for failures? This brings a whole new dimension to my struggle with “permission to fail”. Even if I fail, Christ is there to pick up the pieces. What comfort!



Recent Comments